Thursday, February 27, 2025

Adam Smith's influence on three Jane Austen Novels

The three articles linked below were all written by Shannon Chamberlain, a professor at St. John's College in Santa Fe, New Mexico. They are from the website AdamSmithWorks.

All of these articles are excellent and my brief comments don't do them justice. They are there just to give you an idea of some issues that are discussed in each article. But each article explores how Austen's works reflect Smith's ideas very well.

Jane Austen's Theory of Moral Sentiments: Sense, Sensibility, and Adam Smith

It seems that the fundamental self-delusion that money and material things make us happy actually improves the world for humankind.

"It’s the source of agriculture and trade, the founding of cities and commonwealths, and the source of “all the sciences and arts, which ennoble and embellish human life.”"

The book is about two poor sisters, Elinor & Marianne, and their quests to find husbands. How will love and money affect their choices? Also, it does take some wealth to gain respect and position in society. 

Jane Austen's Theory of Moral Sentiments: Pride, Prejudice, and Prudence

Prudence is not only about taking proper care of ourselves but it is also about trying to look good in the eyes of the "impartial spectator." This article discusses prudence in the context of the main character, Elizabeth, and her friend Charlotte, and how they use it to each find a suitable husband. 

Jane Austen's Theory of Moral Sentiments: The Failed Speculator in Persuasion.

Again, the book involves the quest by the main characters to find suitable spouses. 

"it is an interrogation of rationality and the limits of our ability to predict the future, especially the economic future, and the necessity of living with our failed speculations."

And speculation is not just about the economy. It is also about predicting how other people will do in the future. Will they be successful even if they are not rich right now? These questions might have been especially hard to answer with the industrial revolution getting under way and the social structure changing.

"Good speculation and assumption of risk are a part of both moral and financial calculus"

Related posts:

A ChatGPT story: What if Jane Austen and Adam Smith met to discuss his book The Theory of Moral Sentiments? (2025) 

Pride and Profit: The Intersection of Jane Austen and Adam Smith (2024)

Here is an excerpt from that post which was from a review of the book Pride and Profit:

This fine book by the professors of economics Cecil E. Bohanon and Michelle Albert Vachris is a step forward because they present the full picture of the problem in the following sense: they go over all the novels by Austen and indicate what they call the “intersections” of her ideas and Smith’s in order to prove that she “embellishes, refines, and explains Adam Smith” (p. 4).

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

As U.S. Sales Fall, Companies Struggle to Find Right Price

When I taught, I always told my students that it was not easy to start and run a business. There are many decisions to make, including what price to charge. If all of these decisions were easy then we could all get rich running our own business.

Falling sales could be caused by a rightward shift in demand. When that happens prices fall. But it probably is not easy for stores & companies to guess exactly how much demand has fallen in order to know how much to cut price.

See With Falling U.S. Sales, Companies Are Trying to Hit the Sweet Spot for Prices: Makers of cigarettes, snacks and cosmetics are tinkering with their products to win back value-obsessed shoppers by Natasha Khan of The WSJ. Excerpts:

"Shoppers are getting more difficult to please. Confronted with falling sales, makers of cigarettes, potato chips, cosmetics and garbage bags are re-examining what they offer—and at what price.

Reynolds American is trying to reach low-income smokers with a more affordable pack of Newport cigarettes. The maker of Cheetos and Doritos is playing around with how many servings of chips it includes in a multipack."

Consumers are on edge. Tariff threats, stock-market swings and whipsawing directives from the White House are causing Americans to feel more pessimistic about the economy than they did before President Trump took office. Consumer sentiment fell about 5% in the University of Michigan’s preliminary February survey to its lowest reading since July 2024.

Many consumers are looking for good value, but that doesn’t necessarily mean a lower price.

“They are looking for better and enhanced value in the products, which means they are trading up to innovation,” Linda Rendle, CEO of Clorox said on a call with analysts this month." 

 “When we talk to consumers, value is the number one decision maker,” PepsiCo CEO Ramon Laguarta told analysts this month."

Monday, February 24, 2025

Why Your Valentine’s Chocolate Is Getting More Expensive

Cocoa futures have climbed more than 80% since this time last year

By Owen Tucker-Smith of The WSJ. Excerpts:

"cocoa futures . . . ended Thursday at $10,538 a metric ton. That is around 86% higher than a year ago and more than three times the typical price over the last two decades."

"Bad weather and plant diseases have wrecked crops in West Africa’s growing regions, where aging cacao trees are becoming less productive. Meanwhile, a European Union deforestation law and low returns for growers have limited the planting of new groves. The extent of the supply issues means that prices are unlikely to return soon to the levels chocolate makers and consumers have been accustomed to paying"

"But a string of dry months has disappointed chocolate sellers, setting up the industry for a fourth consecutive year of supply shortfalls."

"it takes years to grow a new cacao tree"

"The world’s biggest chocolate makers, like Hershey and Mondelēz International, said their prices are rising much more slowly than the price of cocoa, and they prefer taking a hit to profits over a blow to demand. Mondelēz Chief Executive Dirk Van de Put told investors recently that the company needed to maintain its price thresholds “so that consumers can continue to enjoy their chocolate,” adding that cocoa prices would “eventually” come down. 

Many trees in West Africa have died due to cacao swollen-shoot virus, which causes root necrosis."

"Some analysts said that to shore up supply, the industry should invest in production outside West Africa. But shifting cocoa’s center of output is easier said than done. In an industry like corn, farmers can respond to a weak harvest by planting more the next year. But cacao trees take years to grow. Farmers can respond to drought by adding external water sources to trees, but doing so doesn’t help the tree until the following year’s harvest."

Related posts:

Chocolate Prices Have Soared. A New Law Threatens to Keep Them High: A European Union law that aims to make chocolate more sustainable has left farmers racing to map their plots (2024) 

Record Cocoa Prices Are Making Sweet Cravings Expensive (2024)

Cocoa Cartel Stirs Up Global Chocolate Market (2020)

What Chocolate Shortage? Cocoa Prices Steady as Record Output Projected  (2019) 

Economy Got You Down? Buy An $8 Chocolate Bar For A Little "Compensatory Consumption" (2008)

Sunday, February 23, 2025

What Trump’s Plan to Stop Minting Pennies Means for Consumers

The need for a penny has long been questioned, but some fear getting rid of it could push up prices

By Oyin Adedoyin and Dalvin Brown of The WSJ. When I taught, this came up in the book The Economics of Macro Issues.

Excerpts:

"It cost 3.7 cents to make one in 2024. That is up from 3.07 cents in 2023, 2.7 cents in 2022 and 2.1 cents in 2021.

It costs so much more to make a penny than its value that the U.S. Mint reported losing some $85.3 million last year on the nearly 3.2 billion pennies it produced.

Today, they are made mostly of zinc and some copper."

"The U.S. Mint estimated that it could save about $250 million over 10 years by suspending penny production"

"Americans throw away as much as $68 million a year in coins

"Rounding up and down to the nearest nickel shouldn’t affect the price that customers pay in a store, said Jeff Lenard of the National Association of Convenience Stores, an industry group.

Another argument against doing away with the penny: It could drive up use of the nickel. The five-cent coin cost nearly 14 cents to make last year.

The Canadian government said it would stop producing the penny in 2012"

"As pennies gradually left circulation, cash transactions were rounded to the nearest nickel."

"When the Canadian government removed one-cent coins, it noted that New Zealand and Australia had stopped producing one-cent pieces in the 1990s and it didn’t increase inflation."

"“Trump’s move doesn’t claim to permanently eliminate the penny, which would clearly be Congress’s decision,” said Robert Whaples, an economist at Wake Forest University who has argued that the mint should stop producing pennies. “Rather, it halts minting new pennies, and the decision about how many pennies to produce each year seems to be within the executive branch’s power.”"

Saturday, February 22, 2025

Buy the House First, Get Married Later: Couples’ New Math

Unmarried home buyers say they are giving priority to a financial foundation over a legal one

By Dalvin Brown and Paul Overberg of The WSJ. Excerpts:

"In 2023, about 555,000 unmarried couples said that they had bought their home in the previous year, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of Census Bureau data. That is up 46% from 10 years earlier, when just under 381,000 couples did the same.

Unmarried couples amounted to more than 11% of all U.S. home sales. The percentage has climbed steadily over the past two decades—a period in which marriage rates have fallen. These couples make up triple the share of the housing market that they did in the mid-1980s, according to the National Association of Realtors.

To make it work, couples must look past the significant risk that the relationship could blow up, or something could happen to one partner. Without a marriage certificate, living situations and finances are more likely to fall into limbo, attorneys say."

"The ages at which people buy homes and enter marriages have both been trending upward. The median age of first marriage for men is 30.2, and for women, 28.6, according to the Census Bureau. That is up from 29.3 and 27.0 a decade earlier. The National Association of Realtors reported this year that the median age of first-time buyers was 38, up from 31 in 2014.

Family lawyers—and parents—sometimes suggest protections in case the unmarried couple breaks up. A prenup-like cohabitation agreement spells out who keeps the house, and how to divide the financial obligations. Without the divorce process, a split can be even messier, legal advisers say.

Family law attorneys say more unmarried people are calling for legal advice, but often balk at planning for a potential split, along with the cost of drawing up such agreements, which can range from $1,000 to $3,000, according to attorney-matching service Legal Match."

Related posts:

If You Date Me, You Date My Debt: Romance can pose challenges to those with large credit balances, student loans or other financial obligations (2025)

Hey Baby, Can I Get Your Number? And by That, I Mean Your Credit Score (2024)

When It Comes to Marriage and Money, Opposites Attract (2023)

Who Pays on the First Date? No One Knows Anymore, and It’s Really Awkward (2017)

Can Giving Up Money And Material Things Lead To More Love? (2011)

31% Of Americans Cheat On Their Spouses--About Finances (2011)

Can You Put A Price Tag On Love? (2010)

Do Women Really Value Income over Looks in a Mate? by Marina Adshade (2010) 

Should You Break Up With Your Fiancé If They Have Too Much Debt?  (2010)

Do Opposites Attract? Not Usually, Except Maybe When It Comes To Money (2009)

When Women Earn More Than Men, Is Dating Affected? (2007)

Thursday, February 20, 2025

Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism and Intellectuals

See Socialists, Knowledge of History and Agency. These are letters to the editor of The WSJ in response to an article about socialism by Joseph Epstein. The one below reminded me of a 1992 article by Robert Samuelson in Newsweek.

"Joseph Epstein’s “Socialists Don’t Know History” (op-ed, May 30, 2019) on the abysmal historical knowledge of young people brings to mind the prophesy of the keenest of economists, Joseph Schumpeter, in 1942 when he said that capitalism would destroy itself by breeding a “new class: bureaucrats, intellectuals, professors, lawyers, journalists, all of them beneficiaries and, in fact, parasitical on them and yet, all of them opposed to the ethos of wealth production, of saving and of allocating resources to economic productivity.” The 77 years since then has proven Schumpeter a major prophet.

Larry W. White
Dallas"
See also Schumpeter: The Prophet by Robert Samuelson (this is the article from Newsweek in 1992). Excerpts:
"He is best known for his evocative phrase "creative destruction." Schumpeter saw capitalism as a system that produces material progress-rising living standards, more creature comforts-through the turmoil of new technologies and business methods. The "entrepreneur," a man of great vision and energy (in his day, there were few women in business), was the driving force of change. Sam Walton and Wal-Mart fit his theory perfectly."

"It is precisely because the "gale" (his term) of creative destruction seems so ferocious that Schumpeter has enjoyed a revival. But he had a second stunning insight that also is relevant. He argued that capitalism's vast economic success generates popular dissatisfaction with capitalism. As prosperity increases, progress is taken for granted. Capitalism's remaining shortcomings-including the disruption caused by creative destruction-become increasingly intolerable. Finally,, prosperity expands the class of intellectuals who are contemptuous of capitalism."

""[C]apitalism ... creates, educates and subsidizes a vested interest in social unrest," Schumpeter wrote. Popular discontent and intellectual hostility would, he thought, doom capitalism and lead to socialism."

"capitalist economic success, because it is incomplete and interrupted, breeds its own backlash. The sour public reaction to the present slow economic recovery only highlights a longstanding trend. The growth of Big Government-here, in Europe and in most advanced market societies-has aimed to placate popular discontent without undermining capitalism's ability to raise living standards."

"Its [his book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy] genius is to explain why capitalism succeeds as Adam Smith imagined, even though modern economies lack Smith's perfect competition with hordes of tiny companies. In today's industries, big firms often dominate and enjoy monopoly profits. But most monopolies are temporary, Schumpeter argued. Their high profits, far from stifling competition, inspire more innovation from entrepreneurs and big companies alike. Cable TV assaults the networks; fax machines replace mail; McDonald's invents fast food.

But the drawn-out nature of this process makes capitalism hard to defend politically, Schumpeter said. The argument for it "must rest on long-run considerations." The "unemployed [worker] of today [has] to forget his personal fate and the politician of today his personal ambition." This was not likely."

Related posts:

Are College Professors Liberal? (2006)

Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism? (2007)

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

Some economics of A.I.

See Is Artificial Intelligence Really Worth the Hype? After the arrival of a less costly A.I. model from China, U.S. markets and academics are wrestling with the ultimate economic value of the technology by Jeff Sommer of The NY Times. Excerpts:

"Is the main approach to developing A.I. in the United States — pouring billions of dollars into chips and infrastructure — worth the expenditure for all companies if similar results can be achieved far more cheaply? DeepSeek’s lower-cost innovations add urgency to bigger, longstanding financial questions: How much are artificial intelligence companies really worth, and what will the broader economic value of A.I. ultimately be?"

"Daron Acemoglu, a winner of the 2024 Nobel in economic science," [said] "many financial and economic calculations were being based on mere “projections into the future that are sometimes exaggerated.”"

[Acemoglu] "is skeptical about the more fervent A.I. claims. He ranks A.I. as a significant advance, perhaps with a macroeconomic effect akin to the telephone, which was no small thing."

"But don’t get carried away, he said, at least not yet. He doubts that full, advanced artificial general intelligence “that can do anything a human can do, but more,” will be achieved. Therefore, over the next decade, he estimated, increased productivity from the diffusion of impressive, but limited, A.I. engines will increase the size of the U.S. economy by only about 1 percent, or roughly 0.1 percent a year."

"if one or more companies achieve true, complete, artificial general intelligence within the next several years, then his estimates will turn out to be far too low."

"From Jan. 24, when DeepSeek’s A.I. innovation began to roil the market, Tesla shares have fallen 11 percent.

Other A.I. companies fared nearly as badly.

Shares of Nvidia, whose chips run much advanced A.I., have dropped 9 percent. Aswath Damodaran, a New York University finance professor who has evaluated many tech companies, said DeepSeek’s efficiency implied that fewer and less-advanced chips would be needed for many A.I. functions. As a result, he wrote recently, the market for Nvidia’s high-end chips isn’t likely to grow as rapidly as expected. So, he said, Nvidia shares will be worth less than anticipated, even after the recent price decline.

In addition, shares of nuclear-powered electricity providers like the utilities Constellation and Vistra, which had soared in the expectation that A.I. data factories would need ever-increasing quantities of power, sank on reduced projections of the required electricity.

Meta, Alphabet and Microsoft, which have invested billions in A.I. development, have had mixed performances since DeepSeek’s arrival. Alphabet and Microsoft have fallen, while Meta has risen 11 percent."

See The Dangerous A.I. Nonsense That Trump and Biden Fell For by Zeynep Tufekci of The NY Times. Excerpts:

"there have been a lot of frantic attempts to figure out how DeepSeek did it and whether it was all above board. Those are not the most important questions, and the excessive focus on them is an example of precisely how we got caught off guard in the first place.

The real lesson of DeepSeek is that America’s approach to A.I. safety and regulations — the concerns espoused by both the Biden and Trump administrations, as well as by many A.I. companies — was largely nonsense. It was never going to be possible to contain the spread of this powerful emergent technology, and certainly not just by placing trade restrictions on components like graphics chips. That was a self-serving fiction, foisted on out-of-touch leaders by an industry that wanted the government to kneecap its competitors."

"The core idea that powers the artificial intelligence revolution, on the other hand, has been around since the 1940s. What opened the floodgates was the arrival first of vast data sets (via the internet and other digital technologies) and then of powerful graphics processors (like the ones from Nvidia), which can compute A.I. models from those data troves."

"Some A.I. models . . . can fit on a USB stick, and can be endlessly replicated and built upon just by plugging that stick into new laptops

Initially developing a new model, like ChatGPT, is a very costly process, but it’s the output, known as the model weights, that are so valuable, and so replicable. Companies like OpenAI, which has loudly proclaimed that A.I. poses an existential threat to humanity, kept these model weights to themselves, lest others piggyback on all that expensive development work to produce something even more powerful.

And if those protection-minded companies made a lot of money because of the U.S. government’s defensive measures? Well, that’s just the price of keeping humanity safe, right?

Those companies had an ally in President Joe Biden — especially, said his deputy chief of staff for policy, Bruce Reed, after he watched “Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning Part One,” a story of A.I. gone rogue. Having already signed one executive order restricting the sale of those crucial chips to China, Biden signed another to establish safety and security mandates.

The Trump administration is operating under the same faulty logic."

"DeepSeek . . . says it spent little of what OpenAI and others spent, because it was able to optimize its software and train its model more efficiently."

"Still, not everyone believes that account, especially given questions about China’s respect for intellectual property rights and trade restrictions. Could the company have amassed a forbidden stash of Nvidia chips? Maybe. Could the cost of developing the model have been higher than was disclosed? Some estimates suggest so. OpenAI says that DeepSeek may have stolen some of its work."

"Within the industry, there’s a popular trope that the real turning point will be the development of A.G.I., or artificial general intelligence, when A.I. reaches human-level intelligence and potentially becomes autonomous."

"We have reached the other A.G.I. turning point: artificial good-enough intelligence — A.I. that is fast, cheap, scalable and useful for a wide range of purposes"

"America can’t re-establish its dominance over the most advanced A.I. because the technology, the data and the expertise that created it are already distributed all around the world."

See Professor’s perceptron paved the way for AI – 60 years too soon by Melanie Lefkowitz of The Cornell Chronicle. This is an article linked above the core idea of A.I. having been around along time. Excerpt:

"In July 1958, the U.S. Office of Naval Research unveiled a remarkable invention.

An IBM 704 – a 5-ton computer the size of a room – was fed a series of punch cards. After 50 trials, the computer taught itself to distinguish cards marked on the left from cards marked on the right.

It was a demonstration of the “perceptron” – “the first machine which is capable of having an original idea,” according to its creator, Frank Rosenblatt ’50, Ph.D. ’56.

At the time, Rosenblatt – who later became an associate professor of neurobiology and behavior in Cornell’s Division of Biological Sciences – was a research psychologist and project engineer at the Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory in Buffalo, New York.

“Stories about the creation of machines having human qualities have long been a fascinating province in the realm of science fiction,” Rosenblatt wrote in 1958. “Yet we are about to witness the birth of such a machine – a machine capable of perceiving, recognizing and identifying its surroundings without any human training or control.”

He was right – but it took half a century to prove it."

Related posts:

Some good news on productivity (2025) (AI is mentioned)

The AI-Generated Population Is Here, and They’re Ready to Work (2024)

Robots writing science fiction (2024)

Will technology cost artists their job? (2023)

“Why did the human stare at the glass of orange juice?” “They were trying to concentrate.” (2023) (Partly about AI being used to tell jokes)

The $900,000 AI Job Is Here (2023) 

Prompt engineers chat with generative-AI chatbots (creative destruction and how the economy just keeps creating new types of occupations & professions) (2023)

Are robots writing fake product reviews? (2022)

What if companies can't afford real models for their ads? Use AI generated fake pictures (2020) 

An AI Breaks the Writing Barrier (2020) 

What Econ 101 Can Teach Us About Artificial Intelligence: Here's why advancing technology often leads to more jobs for humans, not fewer (2017)

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Who Says Entrepreneurs Are Heroes?

Remarks prepared by me for the first HERO'S JOURNEY ENTREPRENEURSHIP FESTIVAL, March 31st, 2007 at Pepperdine University

Given that business is not always seen in a positive light in our society, it might seem like too much to call entrepreneurs heroes since we usually reserve that honor for people like doctors, nurses, fire fighters, soldiers, teachers, etc. But it is not just me (see references) or Elliot McGucken (organizer of the HERO'S JOURNEY ENTREPRENEURSHIP FESTIVAL). Others have said so, people who know what they are talking about. I will briefly describe how I got into this research, summarize what I found and then describe the views of some other scholars.

            The stimulus for my research came when reading a discussion of how entrepreneurs discover opportunities for economic profit by economist Israel Kirzner. This was part of the required reading for a seminar I attended in 1989 put on by the classically liberal “Institute for Humane Studies.” Economic profit implies making an above average rate of return in your business. Since everyone wants to do so, finding the new business or technology that allows this is not easy. But Kirzner said that discovering these opportunities came from something like “leading a life of purposeful action.” That is not the kind of thing I heard in my Ph. D. training in economics, but it did remind me of what the mythologist Joseph Campbell, and author of The Hero With a Thousand Faces, advised people to do: follow your bliss or do what really excites you, what makes you feel like you are achieving some kind of personal destiny. What could be more purposeful than that?

            In 1991 I began working on this seriously. In addition to the bliss connection mentioned above, I think I found two other important parallels. The first involves what Campbell calls the “monomyth”:

“The standard path of the mythological adventure of the hero is a magnification of the formula represented in the rites of passage: separation-initiation-return, which might be named the nuclear unit of the monomyth. A hero ventures forth from the world of common day into a region of supernatural wonder; fabulous forces are there encountered and a decisive victory is won; the hero comes back from this mysterious adventure with the power to bestow boons on his fellow man."

How is the hero's adventure similar to the entrepreneur's adventure? The hero's journey begins with a call to adventure. He or she is awakened by some herald which touches his or her unconscious world and creative destiny. The entrepreneur, too, is "called" to the adventure. By chance, he or is discovers a previously unknown product or way to make a profit. The lucky discovery cannot be planned and is itself the herald of the adventure. The entrepreneur must step out of the ordinary way of producing and into his or her imagination about the way things could be to discover the previously undreamt of technique or product. The "fabulous forces" might be applying the assembly line technique or interchangeable parts to producing automobiles or building microcomputers in a garage. The mysterious adventure is the time spent tinkering in research and development. But once those techniques are discovered or developed, the entrepreneur now has the power to bestow this boon on the rest of humankind. So a second parallel is that both the hero and the entrepreneur go through the separation-initiation-return.

The third important similarity I found is where Campbell refers to the constant change in the universe as "The Cosmogonic Cycle" which "unrolls the great vision of the creation and destruction of the world which is vouchsafed as revelation to the successful hero." This is similar to Joseph Schumpeter's theory of entrepreneurship called “creative destruction.” A successful entrepreneur simultaneously destroys and creates a new world, or at least a new way of life. Henry Ford, for example, destroyed the horse and buggy age while creating the age of the automobile.

My article “The Calling of the Entrepreneur” was published in the November/December 1992 issue of a business bulletin called The New Leaders. A longer version was presented at the annual meetings of the Western Economic Association, July 1992. I also went on to publish three other articles in academic journals relating economics to mythology (see references).

So who else believes this? Let’s start with Candace Allen and Dwight Lee. Allen has won national, state and local recognition as a teacher in Pueblo, Colorado. Her numerous awards include the 1993 National Milken Award for innovative approaches to education and total quality management in the classroom, and second place in the 1995 Foundation for Teaching Economics National Prize for Excellence in Economics Education competition. Lee is the Ramsey Chair of Private Enterprise at the University of Georgia. He has written numerous scholarly articles and books. Their 1996 Journal of Private Enterprise article called “The Entrepreneur as Hero” won the best paper award

Perhaps the main point of their article was: “Just as the society that doesn't venerate winners of races will produce fewer champion runners than the society that does, the society that does not honor entrepreneurial accomplishment will find fewer people of ability engaged in wealth creation than the society that does.” So it is dangerous and costly to say that entrepreneurs are not heroes. Ms. Allen was also invited to give a speech on this at the Federal Reserve Bank in Dallas. In that speech, she used Joseph Campbell to make the comparison (something she and Lee did not do in the Journal of Private Enterprise article). Her speech was published in Economic Insights (from the Dallas FED). It was then reprinted in both the Independent Review and The Freeman.

Next we move to Narayana N. R. Murthy, Chairman and CEO of Infosys Technologies. His commencement address to The Wharton graduating MBA class of 2001 was called “Reflections of an entrepreneur.” He closed his remarks with

“Some of you might remember an acclaimed series of interviews that the highly talented Bill Moyers had done on PBS with Joseph Campbell, the great American mythologist and folklorist, some years ago. Deep into a profound discussion about life, Bill Moyers leans over and asks Joseph Campbell, “Joe, I am sure you have thought about this question. Why are we here on this earth? What is the path for one to follow?” Joseph Campbell smiled gently and said, “Yes, I have thought about it and the only answer I have found is this. Follow your bliss. All else will follow.” So, my young friends, I urge you: Choose a worthy dream for yourself. Go after it confidently. Create a life that your great alma mater will be proud of in the years to come. But always, without fail, ensure that you are following your bliss.”

Now James Kouzes, author of The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations. He has served as director of the Executive Development Center of the University of Santa Clara. He's also an executive fellow, Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University. Here is what he told Jeffrey Mishlove on the “Thinking Allowed” TV program:

“It struck me when Campbell was describing the universal myth, the vision quest. It begins with some sense of dissatisfaction, some sense that there's an opportunity out there -- I'm not quite certain what it is, but I feel some internal struggle about that. And then it leads one to set off on some kind of journey to find that. And typically they meet some mentor, or some experience happens where they learn some new lessons, and they become more and more aware of their own inner strength. That typically is the story of the people that we interviewed, and that typically, I think, is the story of the new mythical hero in the world today -- at least one of the new ones, the entrepreneur, the business person who is dissatisfied with large corporations and wants to set off and start up a new venture outside of the mainstream. I think there's a perfect connection between what Campbell is saying about mythology and what we and others are discovering about leadership.”

            Next up is Jerry Osteryoung, Executive Director of the Jim Moran Institute for Global Entrepreneurship in the College of Business at Florida State University and the Director of the Entrepreneurship Program. Additionally, he is the Jim Moran Professor of Entrepreneurship and Professor of Finance and has written eight books. . Over the last ten years, he has directly assisted over 3000 entrepreneurs. Additionally, he has written a weekly article on entrepreneurship for the Tallahassee Democrat. His May 6, 2005 blog entry was titled “Follow Your Bliss.” It opens with a quote from Campbell about following your bliss and Osteryoung later writes: “Clearly, if you have a passion, it so important to follow it. If you are an entrepreneur just to make money (I do not know any entrepreneurs who are in it just for the money), you are just not going to be successful. I think success is related more to the passion of the entrepreneur than to anything else. It is so hard to sustain yourself if you do not have a certain passion to keep you going.”

            How about an economist? Walter Williams, actually. He is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics George Mason University. A speech he made at Hillsdale College in March 2005 was called “The Entrepreneur As American Hero.” The most telling line in his speech was “For the most part, in a free society, people who are wealthy have become so through effectively serving their fellow man.” That is the only way to make a profit. Although he does not get into mythology or quote Joseph Campbell, he asserts that most of the material progress of the 20th century comes from entrepreneurs.

            This is not just an American phenomenon. For an international perspective, we can turn to Johan Norberg, the author of several books on human rights, economic freedom and the history of liberalism. His book In Defense of Global Capitalism (Cato, 2003) received the goldmedal from the German Hayek Foundation and the Anthony Fisher Memorial Award from the Atlas Foundation. Norberg is a senior fellow at the Centre for the New Europe. He made a speech at the CATO Institute called “Entrepreneurs Are the Heroes of the World.” Here is part of what he said:

“There is a classic work by Joseph Campbell, a book on cultural history called The Hero with a Thousand Faces, about heroes in different cultures. Because Campbell traveled the world by reading books from other continents, he could see that there are heroes in all cultures, in all books, in all eras. We need heroes, because they say something about what our values are, what is good, what is great, what is bad, what we should strive for, and what we should try to avoid. He saw a common pattern. He thought that in most cultures and in most eras the same kinds of things are seen as heroic. Something big happens, and our hero is forced to go on a journey to fight hostile enemies against all odds with a lack of knowledge of what to do and when and how. But along the way he makes some friends who help him along and give him the knowledge and the inspiration to do what is right. Think about that heroic journey once again, and think of the persons I just talked about—people like you, thinkers, innovators, entrepreneurs. What makes it possible for us to buy equipment and goods from the other side of the world? Entrepreneurs face ancient traditions, political obstacles, taxes, and regulations, but they also have friends—people with access to capital, to knowledge, to other businesses. If they are lucky, entrepreneurs succeed. If not, they learn something new, make it even better the next time, and bring to the community something new that changes lives forever. That is the heroic epic. The entrepreneur is the hero of our world.”

            Sticking with the international theme, in 2006 Campbell also came up at the Rueschlikon Conference on Information Policy. The title of the conference report was Innovative Entrepreneurship and Public Policy: Hero with a Thousand Faces. It opens with a quote from Campbell “Where you stumble, there your treasure lies.” One passage from the report reads:

“[One] way tacit knowledge is communicated is through narrative and myth: the timeless lessons of literature and art. (So too, when the Rueschlikon organizers wanted to document the discussions, they turned to a professional storyteller – a journalist – to write the report.) Indeed, the title of this year’s report and introductory aphorism tries to implicitly draw this connection by borrowing the title from a book by Joseph Campbell, a scholar of mythology.” (p. 52)

The author of this report was Kenneth Cukier, a technology correspondent for The Economist.1

Getting back a little closer to home, the January 21, 2007 edition of the San Francisco Chronicle quoted James Currier, the founder of the internet company Tickle2 saying "Starting a business is an adventure. It can build your character as you build the business in that Joseph Campbell 'The Hero With a Thousand Faces' kind of way."

            Even a Nobel Prize winner in economics hints at the heroic nature of entrepreneurship. Writing in The Wall Street Journal in October of 2006, he said, using what he called an Aristotelian perspective on the "development of talents": 

“In an economy in which entrepreneurs are forbidden to pursue their self-realization, they have the bottom scores in self-realization--no matter if they take paying jobs instead--and that counts whether or not they were born the "least advantaged." So even if their activities did come at the expense of the lowest-paid workers, Rawlsian justice in this extended sense requires that entrepreneurs be accorded enough opportunity to raise their self-realization score up to the level of the lowest-paid workers--and higher, of course, if workers are not damaged by support for entrepreneurship. In this case, too, then, the introduction of entrepreneurial dynamism serves to raise Rawls's bottom scores.” (the philosopher John Rawls, as you know, argued that justice meant maximizing the welfare of the least well off in society)

“It would be a non sequitur to give up on private entrepreneurs and financiers as the wellspring of dynamism merely because the fruits of their dynamism would likely be less than they could be in a less imperfect system. I conclude that capitalism is justified--normally by the expectable benefits to the lowest-paid workers but, failing that, by the injustice of depriving entrepreneurial types (as well as other creative people) of opportunities for their self-expression.”

It is not too big a stretch, I believe, to see the quest for self-realization and self-expression (the way Phelps presents it) as equivalent to following your bliss.

There is one more expert to here from. We will listen to an interview with this author where he and the host discuss creativity (the transcript of this in the appendix). The conversation was between Joseph Campbell Michael Toms, host of the New Dimensions Radio Program. Campbell called the entrepreneur the “real hero” in our society.

Joseph Campbell on Entrepreneurship 

Tape #1901: "Call of the Hero" with Joseph Campbell interviewed by Michael Toms New Dimensions Foundation audio tape from a live interview on San Francisco's radio station KQED 

The following exchange was part of a discussion of the question of: What is creativity? 

Toms: In a sense it's the going for, the jumping over the edge and moving into the adventure that really catalyzes the creativity, isn't it? 

Campbell: I would say so, you don't have creativity otherwise.

Toms: Otherwise there's no fire, you're just following somebody else's rules. 

Campbell: Well, my wife is a dancer. She has had dance companies for many, many years. I don't know whether I should talk about this. But when the young people are really adventuring, it's amazing what guts they have and what meager lives they can be living, and yet the richness of the action in the studio. Then, you are going to have a concert season. They all have to join a union. And as soon as they join a union, their character changes. (emphasis added, but Campbell changed the tone of his voice) There are rules of how many hours a day you can rehearse. There are certain rules of how many weeks of rehearsal you can have. They bring this down like a sledge hammer on the whole thing. There are two mentalities. There's the mentality of security, of money. And there's the mentality of open risk. 

Toms: In other societies we can look and see that there are those that honor elders. In our society it seems much like the elders are part of the main stream and there is a continual kind of wanting to turn away from what the elders have to say, the way it is, the way to do it. The union example is a typical one, where the authority, institution, namely the union comes in and says this is the way it's done. And then one has to fall into line or one has to find something else to do.

Campbell: That's right. 

Toms: And it's like treating this dichotomy between elders and the sons and daughters of the elders. How do you see that in relationship to other cultures? 

Campbell: This comes to the conflict of the art, the creative art and economic security. I don't think I have seen it in other cultures. The artist doesn't have to buck against quite the odds that he has to buck against today. 

Toms: The artist is honored in other cultures. 

Campbell: He is honored and quickly honored. But you might hit it off, something that really strikes the need and requirements of the day. Then you've given your gift early. But basically it is a real risk. I think that is so in any adventure, even in business, the man who has the idea of a new kind of gift (emphasis added) to society and he is willing to risk it (this is exactly what George Gilder says in chapter three, "The Returns of Giving" in his book Wealth and Poverty). Then the workers come in and claim they  are the ones that did it.      Then he (the entrepreneur) can't afford to perform his performance. It's a grotesque conflict, I think between the security and the creativity ideas. The entrepreneur is a creator, he's running a risk. 

Toms: Maybe in American capitalistic society the entrepreneur is the creative hero in some sense.

Campbell: Oh, I think he is, I mean the real one. Most people go into economic activities not for risk but for security. You see what I mean. And the elder psychology tends to take over.

This discussion ended and after a short break a new topic was discussed.

End Notes

1. Kenneth Neil Cukier covers technology and telecoms for The Economist in London. Earlier, his work focused on the international politics of technology, particularly intellectual property and Internet governance. Previously, he was the technology editor of The Asian Wall Street Journal in Hong Kong and a regular commentator on CNBC Asia; before that he was the European Editor of Red Herring. From 1992 to 1996 he worked at The International Herald Tribune in Paris. From 2002 to 2004 Mr. Cukier was a research fellow at the National Center for Digital Government at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, where he worked on a book about the Internet and international relations. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Prospect, The Financial Times and Foreign Affairs, among others. He has been a frequent commentator on business and technology matters for CBS, CNN, NPR and the BBC and others. Mr. Cukier is a term-member at the Council on Foreign Relations. Additionally, he serves on the board of advisors to the Daniel Pearl Foundation. (from http://www.cukier.com/knccv.html)

2. Tickle is the leading interpersonal media company, providing self-discovery, and social networking services to more than 14 million active members in its community worldwide. Formerly known as Emode.com, Tickle was founded on the belief that personal insight and connections to others could be both scientific and fun. Tickle was founded in 1999 as Emode.com by James Currier, who developed an early passion for Internet technology, new media and social sciences. Currier envisioned how the Internet could be used to help people learn more about themselves and better connect with others in a mutually beneficial environment based on trust and respect. Today, the company employs more than 50 people and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA. (from http://web.tickle.com/about/index.jsp)

REFERENCES

Campbell, Joseph. 1968. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Campbell, Joseph. 1988. The Power of Myth. New York: Doubleday.

Cukier, Kenneth. 2006 Innovative Entrepreneurship and Public Policy: Hero with a Thousand Faces A Report of the 2006 Rueschlikon Conference on Information Policy. (www.cukier.com/writings/Rueschlikon2006-innovation-cukier.pdf)

Guynn, Jessica. 2007. “DOT-COM ON THE CHEAP,” The San Francisco Chronicle, page A-1, January 21, 2007 (http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/21/MNG0JNMFQE1.DTL)

Kirzner, Israel. M. 1979. Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. The University of Chicago Press.

Lee, Dwight R. and Candace Allen Smith. 1997.  “The Entrepreneur on the Heroic Journey,” The Freeman, Vol. 47 No. 4 (April), at http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=3594.  (reprinted in The Independent Review at http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=318)

Mishlove, Jeffrey. “LEADERSHIP FROM WITHIN with JAMES KOUZES.”  (http://www.intuition.org/txt/kouzes.htm)

Morong, Cyril. 1992. "The Calling of the Entrepreneur." The New Leaders: The Business Bulletin for Transformative Leadership, November/December.

Morong, Cyril. 1994. "Mythology, Joseph Campbell, and the Socioeconomic Conflict,” The Journal of Socio-Economics, Volume 23, No.4.

Morong, Cyril. 1996. "Economists, Parsifal, and the Search for the Holy Grail," Journal of Economic Issues, December.

Murthy, Narayana. 2001. “Reflections of an entrepreneur.” Commencement address given to Wharton graduating MBA class of 2001. (http://www.infosys.com/media/Wharton_Reflections_May01.pdf)

New Dimensions. San Francisco: 1991. The Call of The Hero. Audio Tape # 1901. New Dimensions Foundation.

Norberg, Johan. “Entrepreneurs Are the Heroes of the World,” Cato’s Letter: A Quarterly Message on Liberty, Winter 2007, Volume 5, Number 1.

Osteryoung, Jerry. 2005. “Follow Your Bliss,” May 6, 2005 blog entry (http://www.cob.fsu.edu/jmi/articles/Follow_Your_Bliss.cfm)

Phelps, Edmund S. 2006. “Dynamic Capitalism,” page A14, The Wall Street Journal, October 10, 2006

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1962.  Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Smith, Candace Allen. 1997. “The Entrepreneur as Hero.” Economic Insights, Volume 2, Number 1, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Williams, Walter E. 2005. Imprimis (March issue) published by Hillsdale College.