Research contradicts President Trump’s claim that foreigners are footing the bill, and could weaken his hand in the dispute over Greenland
By Tom Fairless of The WSJ. Excerpts:
"Americans, not foreigners, are bearing almost the entire cost of U.S. tariffs, according to new research [published by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy]"
"suggests that the impact of tariffs is likely to show up over time in the form of higher U.S. consumer prices."
[other research] "by the Budget Lab at Yale and economists at Harvard Business School,
finding that only a small fraction of the tariff costs were being borne
by foreign producers."
"foreign exporters absorbed only about 4% of the burden of last year’s
U.S. tariff increases by lowering their prices, while American consumers
and importers absorbed 96%."
"Indian exporters maintained their prices but reduced the volume of
shipments to the U.S. by 18%-24% relative to the European Union, Canada
and Australia"
"The $200 billion in additional U.S. tariff revenue last year “was paid almost exclusively by Americans”"
"only around 20% of the tariffs had fed into higher consumer prices six
months after their introduction, with the bulk eaten by U.S. importers
and retailers."
A tariff is like an excise tax. Below is something that I did in class that explains why price does
not rise as much as the tax (or rise as much as an increase in
production or wholesale costs). So there is some sharing of the cost of the tariff among buyers and sellers.
Here we will look at an excise
tax or a per unit tax. Every time a unit of a good is sold, the
seller must give the government a flat amount, like $1 (not a percentage). If
the government enacts an excise tax, the
supply curve must shift up by the amount of the tax.
In the graph below, suppose that an excise tax of $1 is enacted. There is a new supply
curve. Every point on the new supply line is exactly $1 above the old supply
line.
Notice that every point on S2
is exactly $1 above S1. This because the firms in this market
now need $1 more dollar for each quantity supplied. Before the tax was enacted,
the market needed $1 to supply 1 unit. But now, because of the tax, they need
an extra dollar or $2 to supply 1 unit.
The price has gone from $5.50 to $6.00. This means that
buyers must pay 50 cents more (or $.50 more). So they are paying $.50 of the
$1.00 excise tax. That means that the
seller also pays $.50 of the $1.00 excise tax.
When you buy the product, you give the seller $6.00. But
they must give $1.00 to the government. Before the tax, you gave the seller
$5.50. So now they get $.50 less.
In this case, buyers and sellers evenly split the cost
of the tax. But if the slopes of the supply and demand curves were different,
the buyers or sellers could pay more than half the tax.
Related posts:
Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs (2025)
Why
Haven’t Tariffs Boosted Inflation? This Theory Is Gaining Traction: New
research suggests the actual tariff rates are well below what
economists have suspected (2025)
Trump’s
Tariffs Are Being Picked Up by Corporate America: Neither consumers nor
foreign countries are assuming much of the tariff burden. At least not
yet. (2025)
Are Businesses Absorbing the Tariffs or Passing Them On to Their Customers? (2025)
(This one has supply and demand curves that show that businesses
usually can't pass all of a tax like tariffs on to the buyers and that
how much gets passed along depends on the price elasticity of demand for
the different products)
Trump’s
Tariffs Are Unique in History: U.S. trade policy went through three
eras, focused on ‘revenue, restriction and reciprocity,’ economist
Douglas Irwin says. The 47th president likes all three Rs, and a fourth,
‘retribution.’ (2025)
Can Trump’s Tariff Offensive Deliver New American Jobs? (2025)
Americans Are Stockpiling Ahead of Trump’s Tariffs (2025)
Powell Warns of ‘Challenging Scenario’ for Fed as Trade War Rages (2025)
How Much Do Tariffs Raise Prices? (2025)
Politicians talk about creating manufacturing jobs but do people really want them? (2025)
How some of Trump's policies might affect the economy (2024)
Tariffs
are regressive: they fall more heavily on lower-income families who
tend to spend more of their income on cheap imported goods (2024)
Americans
Are Stockpiling to Get Ahead of Tariffs: Some consumers are snapping up
computer parts, vacuum cleaners, coffee and olive oil before levies
take effect (2024)
Life is full of tradeoffs: If we support American workers with trade restrictions it might mean more inflation (2023)
No comments:
Post a Comment