Friday, January 21, 2011

Milton Friedman vs. John F. Kennedy

Yesterday was the 50th anniversary of Kennedy's famous inaugural address. You might have noticed that Google commemorated it. Many writers have commented on it this past week. Below are the first two paragraphs from the introduction to Friedman's 1962 book Capitalism and Freedom. Friedman won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1976.

"IN A MUCH QUOTED PASSAGE in his inaugural address, President Kennedy said, "Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country." It is a striking sign of the temper of our times that the controversy about this passage centered on its origin and not on its content. Neither half of the statement expresses a relation between the citizen and his government that is worthy of the ideals of free men in a free society. The paternalistic "what your country can do for you" implies that government is the patron, the citizen the ward, a view that is at odds with the free man's belief in his own responsibility for his own destiny.

The organismic, "what you can do for your 'country" implies tht government is the master or the deity, the citizen, the servant or the votary. To the free man, the country is the collection of individuals who compose it, not something over and above them. He is proud of a common heritage and loyal to common traditions. But he regards government as a means, an instrumentality, neither a grantor of favors and gifts, nor a master or god to be blindly worshipped and served. He recognizes no national goal except as it is the consensus of the goals that the citizens severally serve. He recognizes no national purpose except as it is the consensus of the purposes for which the citizens severally strive.

The free man will ask neither what his country can do for him nor what he can do for his country. He will ask rather "What can I and my compatriots do through government" to help us discharge our individual responsibilities, to achieve our several goals and purposes, and above all, to protect our freedom? And he will accompany this question with another: How can we keep the government we create from becoming a Frankenstein that will destroy the very freedom we establish it to protect? Freedom is a rare and delicate plant. Our minds tell us, and history confirms, that the great threat to freedom is the concentration of power. Government is necessary to preserve our freedom, it is an instrument through which we can exercise our freedom; yet by concentrating power in political hands, it is also a threat to freedom. Even though the men who wield this power initially be of good will and even though they be not corrupted by the power they exercise, the power will both attract and form men of a different stamp."


Belinda said...

That's a good quote from Milton Friedman. It has some relevance to Malaysia. I borrowed the quote, I hope you don't mind.

Cyril Morong said...


Thank you for dropping by and commenting. Also, thank you for following my blog. How did you first come across it?

Good luck in your studies. I don't mind you using anything I post here. Did you put it in one of your blogs? What is going on in Malaysia that makes you say it is relevant?

I notice that you have a blog about heroes. Do you think entreprenurs might be heroes? I have written about this. Go to

Entrepreneurs and Heroes


Belinda said...

Hi Cyril, I found your blog whilst surfing. Briefly about Malaysia, the same political group has been in power since independence and its time for a change for reasons like Milton Friedman was talking about.
About entrepeneurs as heroes. Yes, of course, I think some are. I have a Chinese entrepeneur in my blog.
Thanks for your good wishes, Belinda

Cyril Morong said...

Okay, great, thanks!