This is an explanation of how individual firms react to the change that ends up giving us this result. Click this link to see a PDF version.
Suppose
we have a firm that has the following MC and MR lines. Since MR is flat we have
a perfectly competitive market and no firm can influence price.
Figure 1
The
market price must be 12 since MR = 12. The firm has a Q = 12 since that is
where MR = MC.
Then
suppose that there is $2.00 excise tax placed on the product. The MC line has
to shift up by$2.00 because it now costs an additional $2.00 to supply this
good to the market. Recall that the firm’s short run supply curve is its MC
curve above the minimum of AVC. Supplying a good to the market is just not
producing it. It has to be offered for sale to the consumers and now that
requires an additional $2.00. So the MC line shifts up by the amount of the
tax, $2.00. See the graph below.
Figure 2
This
firm will cut back its Q from 12 to 10. We can see that from the intersection
of MC2 and MR1. Also, the firm cannot simply raise the price by $2.00 since it
has no power over price, being a price taker.
Now
suppose that we had 2 firms in the industry (a perfectly competitive industry
will have many more, but we are trying to keep this simple).
Suppose
that the 2 firms have the same MC lines. If we add them together we get the
market supply line. So if we add MC2 from firm A to MC2 for firm B, we get the
new market supply curve as a result of the tax. The table below summarizes this
process.
P
|
Firm A Q
|
Firm B Q
|
Market Q
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
7
|
5
|
5
|
10
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
12
|
9
|
7
|
7
|
14
|
10
|
8
|
8
|
16
|
11
|
9
|
9
|
18
|
12
|
10
|
10
|
20
|
13
|
11
|
11
|
22
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
24
|
15
|
13
|
13
|
26
|
16
|
14
|
14
|
28
|
17
|
15
|
15
|
30
|
18
|
16
|
16
|
32
|
19
|
17
|
17
|
34
|
20
|
18
|
18
|
36
|
21
|
19
|
19
|
38
|
22
|
20
|
20
|
40
|
The
price (P) and Market Q columns combine to make the new supply curve as a result
of the tax. For example, at a price of 6, each firm supplies a Q of 4 to the
market so the market quantity supplied is 8. This is S2 in the graph below.
Again, S2 is the sum of the MC lines of each firm, with each firm having MC2.
Figure 3
Since
each firm reduced its Q by 2 at each price (see the move from MC1 to MC2 in
Figure 2), we can say that the supply curve has shifted to the left by 2 (I
know in class we say that the supply line shifts up by the amount of the tax-it
does shift up by $2.00 here-I am attacking the problem from a different
perspective here).
Notice
also that the price has risen from 12 to 13. That means we have to raise the MR
line in Figure 2 by $1.00. The next graph, Figure 4, shows this. The new MR
line is MR2.
Figure 4
Notice
that MC2 and MR2 intersect at Q = 11. If each of the two firms has a Q of
eleven and P = MR = 13, then the market Q = 22 (2*11 = 22). That is what we see
at P = 13 in Figure 3.
Also
notice in Figure 3, that there is a temporary shortage when supply moves from
S1 to S2. Initially, firms will keep price at 12 when they cut back on their
output (from Q = 12 to Q = 10, see Figure 2). But since all firms are doing
this, a shortage will at first exist. The market quantity supplied will be 20
(finding where a price of 12 hits S2) while the market quantity demanded will
be 24 when P = 12. Firms will soon see that they are not producing enough to
satisfy their customers and will want to raise their quantity supplied. But
that requires an increase in price. Although perfectly competitive firms don’t
normally have power over price, they do have just a bit when there is a
shortage. They know it means people will be willing to pay a bit more.
But
if the firms in an industry understand basic economics, they will probably have
already made the necessary increase in price before this whole scenario happens
because they know it is inevitable.
No comments:
Post a Comment