Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Who Says Entrepreneurs Are Heroes?

Remarks prepared by me for the first HERO'S JOURNEY ENTREPRENEURSHIP FESTIVAL, March 31st, 2007 at Pepperdine University

Given that business is not always seen in a positive light in our society, it might seem like too much to call entrepreneurs heroes since we usually reserve that honor for people like doctors, nurses, fire fighters, soldiers, teachers, etc. But it is not just me (see references) or Elliot McGucken (organizer of the HERO'S JOURNEY ENTREPRENEURSHIP FESTIVAL). Others have said so, people who know what they are talking about. I will briefly describe how I got into this research, summarize what I found and then describe the views of some other scholars.

            The stimulus for my research came when reading a discussion of how entrepreneurs discover opportunities for economic profit by economist Israel Kirzner. This was part of the required reading for a seminar I attended in 1989 put on by the classically liberal “Institute for Humane Studies.” Economic profit implies making an above average rate of return in your business. Since everyone wants to do so, finding the new business or technology that allows this is not easy. But Kirzner said that discovering these opportunities came from something like “leading a life of purposeful action.” That is not the kind of thing I heard in my Ph. D. training in economics, but it did remind me of what the mythologist Joseph Campbell, and author of The Hero With a Thousand Faces, advised people to do: follow your bliss or do what really excites you, what makes you feel like you are achieving some kind of personal destiny. What could be more purposeful than that?

            In 1991 I began working on this seriously. In addition to the bliss connection mentioned above, I think I found two other important parallels. The first involves what Campbell calls the “monomyth”:

“The standard path of the mythological adventure of the hero is a magnification of the formula represented in the rites of passage: separation-initiation-return, which might be named the nuclear unit of the monomyth. A hero ventures forth from the world of common day into a region of supernatural wonder; fabulous forces are there encountered and a decisive victory is won; the hero comes back from this mysterious adventure with the power to bestow boons on his fellow man."

How is the hero's adventure similar to the entrepreneur's adventure? The hero's journey begins with a call to adventure. He or she is awakened by some herald which touches his or her unconscious world and creative destiny. The entrepreneur, too, is "called" to the adventure. By chance, he or is discovers a previously unknown product or way to make a profit. The lucky discovery cannot be planned and is itself the herald of the adventure. The entrepreneur must step out of the ordinary way of producing and into his or her imagination about the way things could be to discover the previously undreamt of technique or product. The "fabulous forces" might be applying the assembly line technique or interchangeable parts to producing automobiles or building microcomputers in a garage. The mysterious adventure is the time spent tinkering in research and development. But once those techniques are discovered or developed, the entrepreneur now has the power to bestow this boon on the rest of humankind. So a second parallel is that both the hero and the entrepreneur go through the separation-initiation-return.

The third important similarity I found is where Campbell refers to the constant change in the universe as "The Cosmogonic Cycle" which "unrolls the great vision of the creation and destruction of the world which is vouchsafed as revelation to the successful hero." This is similar to Joseph Schumpeter's theory of entrepreneurship called “creative destruction.” A successful entrepreneur simultaneously destroys and creates a new world, or at least a new way of life. Henry Ford, for example, destroyed the horse and buggy age while creating the age of the automobile.

My article “The Calling of the Entrepreneur” was published in the November/December 1992 issue of a business bulletin called The New Leaders. A longer version was presented at the annual meetings of the Western Economic Association, July 1992. I also went on to publish three other articles in academic journals relating economics to mythology (see references).

So who else believes this? Let’s start with Candace Allen and Dwight Lee. Allen has won national, state and local recognition as a teacher in Pueblo, Colorado. Her numerous awards include the 1993 National Milken Award for innovative approaches to education and total quality management in the classroom, and second place in the 1995 Foundation for Teaching Economics National Prize for Excellence in Economics Education competition. Lee is the Ramsey Chair of Private Enterprise at the University of Georgia. He has written numerous scholarly articles and books. Their 1996 Journal of Private Enterprise article called “The Entrepreneur as Hero” won the best paper award

Perhaps the main point of their article was: “Just as the society that doesn't venerate winners of races will produce fewer champion runners than the society that does, the society that does not honor entrepreneurial accomplishment will find fewer people of ability engaged in wealth creation than the society that does.” So it is dangerous and costly to say that entrepreneurs are not heroes. Ms. Allen was also invited to give a speech on this at the Federal Reserve Bank in Dallas. In that speech, she used Joseph Campbell to make the comparison (something she and Lee did not do in the Journal of Private Enterprise article). Her speech was published in Economic Insights (from the Dallas FED). It was then reprinted in both the Independent Review and The Freeman.

Next we move to Narayana N. R. Murthy, Chairman and CEO of Infosys Technologies. His commencement address to The Wharton graduating MBA class of 2001 was called “Reflections of an entrepreneur.” He closed his remarks with

“Some of you might remember an acclaimed series of interviews that the highly talented Bill Moyers had done on PBS with Joseph Campbell, the great American mythologist and folklorist, some years ago. Deep into a profound discussion about life, Bill Moyers leans over and asks Joseph Campbell, “Joe, I am sure you have thought about this question. Why are we here on this earth? What is the path for one to follow?” Joseph Campbell smiled gently and said, “Yes, I have thought about it and the only answer I have found is this. Follow your bliss. All else will follow.” So, my young friends, I urge you: Choose a worthy dream for yourself. Go after it confidently. Create a life that your great alma mater will be proud of in the years to come. But always, without fail, ensure that you are following your bliss.”

Now James Kouzes, author of The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations. He has served as director of the Executive Development Center of the University of Santa Clara. He's also an executive fellow, Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University. Here is what he told Jeffrey Mishlove on the “Thinking Allowed” TV program:

“It struck me when Campbell was describing the universal myth, the vision quest. It begins with some sense of dissatisfaction, some sense that there's an opportunity out there -- I'm not quite certain what it is, but I feel some internal struggle about that. And then it leads one to set off on some kind of journey to find that. And typically they meet some mentor, or some experience happens where they learn some new lessons, and they become more and more aware of their own inner strength. That typically is the story of the people that we interviewed, and that typically, I think, is the story of the new mythical hero in the world today -- at least one of the new ones, the entrepreneur, the business person who is dissatisfied with large corporations and wants to set off and start up a new venture outside of the mainstream. I think there's a perfect connection between what Campbell is saying about mythology and what we and others are discovering about leadership.”

            Next up is Jerry Osteryoung, Executive Director of the Jim Moran Institute for Global Entrepreneurship in the College of Business at Florida State University and the Director of the Entrepreneurship Program. Additionally, he is the Jim Moran Professor of Entrepreneurship and Professor of Finance and has written eight books. . Over the last ten years, he has directly assisted over 3000 entrepreneurs. Additionally, he has written a weekly article on entrepreneurship for the Tallahassee Democrat. His May 6, 2005 blog entry was titled “Follow Your Bliss.” It opens with a quote from Campbell about following your bliss and Osteryoung later writes: “Clearly, if you have a passion, it so important to follow it. If you are an entrepreneur just to make money (I do not know any entrepreneurs who are in it just for the money), you are just not going to be successful. I think success is related more to the passion of the entrepreneur than to anything else. It is so hard to sustain yourself if you do not have a certain passion to keep you going.”

            How about an economist? Walter Williams, actually. He is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics George Mason University. A speech he made at Hillsdale College in March 2005 was called “The Entrepreneur As American Hero.” The most telling line in his speech was “For the most part, in a free society, people who are wealthy have become so through effectively serving their fellow man.” That is the only way to make a profit. Although he does not get into mythology or quote Joseph Campbell, he asserts that most of the material progress of the 20th century comes from entrepreneurs.

            This is not just an American phenomenon. For an international perspective, we can turn to Johan Norberg, the author of several books on human rights, economic freedom and the history of liberalism. His book In Defense of Global Capitalism (Cato, 2003) received the goldmedal from the German Hayek Foundation and the Anthony Fisher Memorial Award from the Atlas Foundation. Norberg is a senior fellow at the Centre for the New Europe. He made a speech at the CATO Institute called “Entrepreneurs Are the Heroes of the World.” Here is part of what he said:

“There is a classic work by Joseph Campbell, a book on cultural history called The Hero with a Thousand Faces, about heroes in different cultures. Because Campbell traveled the world by reading books from other continents, he could see that there are heroes in all cultures, in all books, in all eras. We need heroes, because they say something about what our values are, what is good, what is great, what is bad, what we should strive for, and what we should try to avoid. He saw a common pattern. He thought that in most cultures and in most eras the same kinds of things are seen as heroic. Something big happens, and our hero is forced to go on a journey to fight hostile enemies against all odds with a lack of knowledge of what to do and when and how. But along the way he makes some friends who help him along and give him the knowledge and the inspiration to do what is right. Think about that heroic journey once again, and think of the persons I just talked about—people like you, thinkers, innovators, entrepreneurs. What makes it possible for us to buy equipment and goods from the other side of the world? Entrepreneurs face ancient traditions, political obstacles, taxes, and regulations, but they also have friends—people with access to capital, to knowledge, to other businesses. If they are lucky, entrepreneurs succeed. If not, they learn something new, make it even better the next time, and bring to the community something new that changes lives forever. That is the heroic epic. The entrepreneur is the hero of our world.”

            Sticking with the international theme, in 2006 Campbell also came up at the Rueschlikon Conference on Information Policy. The title of the conference report was Innovative Entrepreneurship and Public Policy: Hero with a Thousand Faces. It opens with a quote from Campbell “Where you stumble, there your treasure lies.” One passage from the report reads:

“[One] way tacit knowledge is communicated is through narrative and myth: the timeless lessons of literature and art. (So too, when the Rueschlikon organizers wanted to document the discussions, they turned to a professional storyteller – a journalist – to write the report.) Indeed, the title of this year’s report and introductory aphorism tries to implicitly draw this connection by borrowing the title from a book by Joseph Campbell, a scholar of mythology.” (p. 52)

The author of this report was Kenneth Cukier, a technology correspondent for The Economist.1

Getting back a little closer to home, the January 21, 2007 edition of the San Francisco Chronicle quoted James Currier, the founder of the internet company Tickle2 saying "Starting a business is an adventure. It can build your character as you build the business in that Joseph Campbell 'The Hero With a Thousand Faces' kind of way."

            Even a Nobel Prize winner in economics hints at the heroic nature of entrepreneurship. Writing in The Wall Street Journal in October of 2006, he said, using what he called an Aristotelian perspective on the "development of talents": 

“In an economy in which entrepreneurs are forbidden to pursue their self-realization, they have the bottom scores in self-realization--no matter if they take paying jobs instead--and that counts whether or not they were born the "least advantaged." So even if their activities did come at the expense of the lowest-paid workers, Rawlsian justice in this extended sense requires that entrepreneurs be accorded enough opportunity to raise their self-realization score up to the level of the lowest-paid workers--and higher, of course, if workers are not damaged by support for entrepreneurship. In this case, too, then, the introduction of entrepreneurial dynamism serves to raise Rawls's bottom scores.” (the philosopher John Rawls, as you know, argued that justice meant maximizing the welfare of the least well off in society)

“It would be a non sequitur to give up on private entrepreneurs and financiers as the wellspring of dynamism merely because the fruits of their dynamism would likely be less than they could be in a less imperfect system. I conclude that capitalism is justified--normally by the expectable benefits to the lowest-paid workers but, failing that, by the injustice of depriving entrepreneurial types (as well as other creative people) of opportunities for their self-expression.”

It is not too big a stretch, I believe, to see the quest for self-realization and self-expression (the way Phelps presents it) as equivalent to following your bliss.

There is one more expert to here from. We will listen to an interview with this author where he and the host discuss creativity (the transcript of this in the appendix). The conversation was between Joseph Campbell Michael Toms, host of the New Dimensions Radio Program. Campbell called the entrepreneur the “real hero” in our society.

Joseph Campbell on Entrepreneurship 

Tape #1901: "Call of the Hero" with Joseph Campbell interviewed by Michael Toms New Dimensions Foundation audio tape from a live interview on San Francisco's radio station KQED 

The following exchange was part of a discussion of the question of: What is creativity? 

Toms: In a sense it's the going for, the jumping over the edge and moving into the adventure that really catalyzes the creativity, isn't it? 

Campbell: I would say so, you don't have creativity otherwise.

Toms: Otherwise there's no fire, you're just following somebody else's rules. 

Campbell: Well, my wife is a dancer. She has had dance companies for many, many years. I don't know whether I should talk about this. But when the young people are really adventuring, it's amazing what guts they have and what meager lives they can be living, and yet the richness of the action in the studio. Then, you are going to have a concert season. They all have to join a union. And as soon as they join a union, their character changes. (emphasis added, but Campbell changed the tone of his voice) There are rules of how many hours a day you can rehearse. There are certain rules of how many weeks of rehearsal you can have. They bring this down like a sledge hammer on the whole thing. There are two mentalities. There's the mentality of security, of money. And there's the mentality of open risk. 

Toms: In other societies we can look and see that there are those that honor elders. In our society it seems much like the elders are part of the main stream and there is a continual kind of wanting to turn away from what the elders have to say, the way it is, the way to do it. The union example is a typical one, where the authority, institution, namely the union comes in and says this is the way it's done. And then one has to fall into line or one has to find something else to do.

Campbell: That's right. 

Toms: And it's like treating this dichotomy between elders and the sons and daughters of the elders. How do you see that in relationship to other cultures? 

Campbell: This comes to the conflict of the art, the creative art and economic security. I don't think I have seen it in other cultures. The artist doesn't have to buck against quite the odds that he has to buck against today. 

Toms: The artist is honored in other cultures. 

Campbell: He is honored and quickly honored. But you might hit it off, something that really strikes the need and requirements of the day. Then you've given your gift early. But basically it is a real risk. I think that is so in any adventure, even in business, the man who has the idea of a new kind of gift (emphasis added) to society and he is willing to risk it (this is exactly what George Gilder says in chapter three, "The Returns of Giving" in his book Wealth and Poverty). Then the workers come in and claim they  are the ones that did it.      Then he (the entrepreneur) can't afford to perform his performance. It's a grotesque conflict, I think between the security and the creativity ideas. The entrepreneur is a creator, he's running a risk. 

Toms: Maybe in American capitalistic society the entrepreneur is the creative hero in some sense.

Campbell: Oh, I think he is, I mean the real one. Most people go into economic activities not for risk but for security. You see what I mean. And the elder psychology tends to take over.

This discussion ended and after a short break a new topic was discussed.

End Notes

1. Kenneth Neil Cukier covers technology and telecoms for The Economist in London. Earlier, his work focused on the international politics of technology, particularly intellectual property and Internet governance. Previously, he was the technology editor of The Asian Wall Street Journal in Hong Kong and a regular commentator on CNBC Asia; before that he was the European Editor of Red Herring. From 1992 to 1996 he worked at The International Herald Tribune in Paris. From 2002 to 2004 Mr. Cukier was a research fellow at the National Center for Digital Government at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, where he worked on a book about the Internet and international relations. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Prospect, The Financial Times and Foreign Affairs, among others. He has been a frequent commentator on business and technology matters for CBS, CNN, NPR and the BBC and others. Mr. Cukier is a term-member at the Council on Foreign Relations. Additionally, he serves on the board of advisors to the Daniel Pearl Foundation. (from http://www.cukier.com/knccv.html)

2. Tickle is the leading interpersonal media company, providing self-discovery, and social networking services to more than 14 million active members in its community worldwide. Formerly known as Emode.com, Tickle was founded on the belief that personal insight and connections to others could be both scientific and fun. Tickle was founded in 1999 as Emode.com by James Currier, who developed an early passion for Internet technology, new media and social sciences. Currier envisioned how the Internet could be used to help people learn more about themselves and better connect with others in a mutually beneficial environment based on trust and respect. Today, the company employs more than 50 people and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA. (from http://web.tickle.com/about/index.jsp)

REFERENCES

Campbell, Joseph. 1968. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Campbell, Joseph. 1988. The Power of Myth. New York: Doubleday.

Cukier, Kenneth. 2006 Innovative Entrepreneurship and Public Policy: Hero with a Thousand Faces A Report of the 2006 Rueschlikon Conference on Information Policy. (www.cukier.com/writings/Rueschlikon2006-innovation-cukier.pdf)

Guynn, Jessica. 2007. “DOT-COM ON THE CHEAP,” The San Francisco Chronicle, page A-1, January 21, 2007 (http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/21/MNG0JNMFQE1.DTL)

Kirzner, Israel. M. 1979. Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. The University of Chicago Press.

Lee, Dwight R. and Candace Allen Smith. 1997.  “The Entrepreneur on the Heroic Journey,” The Freeman, Vol. 47 No. 4 (April), at http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=3594.  (reprinted in The Independent Review at http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=318)

Mishlove, Jeffrey. “LEADERSHIP FROM WITHIN with JAMES KOUZES.”  (http://www.intuition.org/txt/kouzes.htm)

Morong, Cyril. 1992. "The Calling of the Entrepreneur." The New Leaders: The Business Bulletin for Transformative Leadership, November/December.

Morong, Cyril. 1994. "Mythology, Joseph Campbell, and the Socioeconomic Conflict,” The Journal of Socio-Economics, Volume 23, No.4.

Morong, Cyril. 1996. "Economists, Parsifal, and the Search for the Holy Grail," Journal of Economic Issues, December.

Murthy, Narayana. 2001. “Reflections of an entrepreneur.” Commencement address given to Wharton graduating MBA class of 2001. (http://www.infosys.com/media/Wharton_Reflections_May01.pdf)

New Dimensions. San Francisco: 1991. The Call of The Hero. Audio Tape # 1901. New Dimensions Foundation.

Norberg, Johan. “Entrepreneurs Are the Heroes of the World,” Cato’s Letter: A Quarterly Message on Liberty, Winter 2007, Volume 5, Number 1.

Osteryoung, Jerry. 2005. “Follow Your Bliss,” May 6, 2005 blog entry (http://www.cob.fsu.edu/jmi/articles/Follow_Your_Bliss.cfm)

Phelps, Edmund S. 2006. “Dynamic Capitalism,” page A14, The Wall Street Journal, October 10, 2006

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1962.  Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Smith, Candace Allen. 1997. “The Entrepreneur as Hero.” Economic Insights, Volume 2, Number 1, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Williams, Walter E. 2005. Imprimis (March issue) published by Hillsdale College.

Monday, February 17, 2025

Some sports economics articles: How the trade hurts Luka Doncic financially, the value of the Eagles and Ohio State and how much people lose betting on sports

See Congrats on Joining the Lakers, Luka Doncic. You Just Lost $32 Million: When Luka Doncic was dealt to Los Angeles in one of the biggest trades in NBA history, tens of millions of dollars in future earnings immediately evaporated by Robert O'Connell of The WSJ. Excerpts:

"from the moment the deal was agreed, Doncic also saw tens of millions of dollars in future earnings instantly go up in smoke.

"Had he stayed in Dallas, Doncic would have been eligible to sign a “Designated Veteran Player Extension,” after next season. That would have paid him 35% of the salary cap, or $345 million over five years. 

The problem is those “supermax” contracts can only be offered to players who meet certain parameters. And unfortunately for Doncic, one of those is that they’re still on their original team."

he will now have to take an alternate route to top-tier NBA riches. Doncic will likely sign a shorter initial deal in Los Angeles, worth $106.1 million over two seasons. That would allow him to sign a supermax deal as soon as he is eligible, in the summer of 2028. (Playing 10 seasons would let him qualify again.) 

But in the meantime, he is stuck making about $17 million less over his first three years with the Lakers than he would have in Dallas."

"With the Mavericks, Doncic played in the tax-friendly state of Texas, where his 41 home games a year—plus several others against the in-state Spurs and Rockets—were subject to zero state income tax.

On the West Coast, Doncic will be subject to a 13.3% state income tax on his earnings at home games, and on every day he practices at the Lakers’ facility, according to Sean Packard, a CPA with numerous pro-athlete clients. In all, he would pay approximately $18.3 million in taxes over his first three seasons in California compared with just $3.3 million had he stayed in Dallas on a supermax deal.

Which means that the total amount he stands to lose over the next three years playing in Lakers gold comes out to something more like $32 million."

See The NFL Has a New Most Valuable Team—and It’s Worth $8.3 Billion: The sale of a minority stake in the Philadelphia Eagles values the club at a record amount for a U.S. sports franchise, underlining the soaring price tag to get into America’s most popular sport by Andrew Beaton of The WSJ. Excerpts:

"the NFL voted this year to allow private-equity investments in its franchises"

"In 2018, the Carolina Panthers sold for $2.2 billion. Four years later, the Denver Broncos went for $4.7 billion. That record lasted barely a year, until private-equity titan Josh Harris completed a $6 billion purchase of the Washington Commanders."

"Philadelphia Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie sold 8% of his franchise to two buyers, with one of those deals valuing the club at $8.3 billion"

"Moreover, the Eagles aren’t even viewed as the NFL’s most valuable franchise. Which means that in this climate, a club such as the Dallas Cowboys could be worth over $10 billion if owner Jerry Jones ever sought to sell all or part of “America’s Team.”"

"Lurie bought the team in 1994 for a reported $185 million."

 "sports teams across the globe are worth more than ever. When British billionaire Jim Ratcliffe bought into soccer giant Manchester United last year, it put the team at $6.3 billion."

See How Much Is Your College Football Team Worth? The Ohio State Buckeyes were just crowned the best team in the country. According to an analysis of what each team would be worth on the open market, they’re also the most valuable program in the sport by Andrew Beaton of The WSJ. Excerpts:

"The Buckeyes would be worth $1.96 billion if the team could be sold on the open market, according to an analysis by Ryan Brewer, an associate professor of finance at Indiana University Columbus. That puts Ohio State just ahead of Texas ($1.9 billion) and rival Michigan ($1.66 billion), with six other programs—Georgia, Notre Dame, LSU, Penn State, Tennessee and Texas A&M—topping the billion dollar mark. 

Brewer conducts his study by analyzing a program’s finances and asking: What would it be worth if it could be bought and sold like a professional franchise?

Brewer looks at top-line revenues, growth and drivers of cash flow and makes projections about the sustainability of the operation, just as he would with any other business. It isn’t a mere one-year snapshot, either—he combed through years of data for 131 major college football programs, from the heavyweights all the way down to Louisiana-Monroe. Then, after breaking down everything from television viewership to trends in enrollment, his spreadsheet finally spits out an answer."

"Brewer’s analysis also accounts for factors that might not appear on any balance sheet. Alabama, for instance, used to get a bump simply because of the value one person brought to the program. But Nick Saban is no longer the coach of the Crimson Tide, and the team missed the expanded playoff without him.

Those types of X-factors are also why Brewer says that in the alternate universe where the top college football teams were on the market, he wouldn’t be surprised if the final price were closer to $4 billion. He calculates what the financials say a team should cost. But sports teams are rare assets where the price tag can blow well past the intrinsic value. The Washington Commanders recently set an NFL record by going for $6 billion."

See You Like to Bet on Sports? Here’s a Reality Check: Study finds that the average bettor expects to make a little money on future bets, even though the average result is a loss of 7.5 cents per dollar by Nick Fortuna in The WSJ. Excerpts:

"A new study by Stanford University researchers finds that the average online sportsbook customer expects a gain of 0.3 cent for every dollar wagered. In reality, sports bettors lose an average of 7.5 cents per dollar wagered, reflecting “widespread overoptimism about financial returns,” according to Matthew Brown, a Stanford doctoral student and lead author of the study."

"10% of bettors were overly optimistic about their potential winnings by more than 20 cents per dollar wagered; 80% were also found to be overly optimistic, but not to the same degree as the most overoptimistic; and the remaining 9% of bettors underestimated their actual future returns.

"“We found that people more or less understood the amount of money they had lost in the past, but they just thought the future would be better,” Brown says.

Bettors participating mostly in parlays—long-shot bets that require multiple correct predictions to win but offer higher payouts than simple wagers—were especially bad at predicting future success. These bettors were an average of 18 cents per dollar more overly optimistic than bettors who rarely played parlays, the study found."

"20% of participants reported betting too much."

"Even when bettors know their past losses, they remained optimistic about the future"

Related posts: 

The economic impact of the Super Bowl is met with skepticism from economists (2024)

Winning the Stanley Cup Is More Taxing Than Ever (2024)

Would you pay $24 million for a great conversation starter? (2024) (A jersey worn by Babe Ruth sold for $24.12 million)

Two sports economics items: Shohei Ohtani impact on tourism & the pay of NFL running backs (2024)

Some Olympic medal winners get alot of extras (2024)

Economic benefits from mega-events like the Olympics are often overstated (2021) 

Do states with income taxes put their sports teams at a disadvantage?  (2021)

Striking out: estimating the economic impact of baseball's World Series  (2021)

March Madness Is a Moneymaker. Most Schools Still Operate in Red.  (2021)

How Much Is The Average MLB salary? (2021)

As Covid-19 Closes Stadiums, Municipalities Struggle With Billions in Debt (2020) 

The San Antonio Spurs And Federal Subsidies (2016) (The Spurs received $41 million in federal subsidies to build the AT&T Center with little economic gain for the community-multiple studies show major private sports stadiums don’t ultimately produce substantial economic growth relative to the government incentives they receive)

Do Tax Rates Affect Where Tennis Players Decide To Live? (2015)

Even If You Don't Like Sports, You Might Be Paying For Them (2011)

Does It Pay to Host the Olympics? (2009)

What Economists Say About "March Madness"  (2009)

Sports, Economics and Politics Collide When Government Officials Get World Series Tickets (2009)

New York City Tax Payers To Pay $1 Billion To See Baseball (2008)

Sunday, February 16, 2025

If You Date Me, You Date My Debt

Romance can pose challenges to those with large credit balances, student loans or other financial obligations

By Julia Munslow of The WSJ. Excerpts:

"For daters, debt can be a turnoff. In a 2024 survey from the Achieve Center for Consumer Insights, 64% of respondents said they wouldn’t want to date someone with a lot of debt."

"The economics of dating aren’t the only issue. Consider the shame that many debtors feel about their financial health."

"New research from Western & Southern Financial Group found that 27% of Americans waited until after marriage to discuss debt with their partner. And 21% of married Americans have never talked about debt with their spouse.

Talia Bombola, a licensed marriage and family therapist, said couples might feel uncomfortable talking about finances, but it is essential to understand the other’s relationship with money to build a life together.

“If you’re dating casually, there’s not a need to share the debt because you’re keeping it more at surface level,” Bombola said. “But if you’re dating with the intention of finding a long-term partner, it’s important to talk about it.”

If your date has debt, ask what kind and how they are managing it. You want to understand their money habits, Bombola said. Someone with student loans and a plan to pay them off has different money-management skills and priorities than someone who has increasing debt from gambling, she said." 

Pepper…and Salt, from The WSJ, August 22, 2024

 Pepper…and Salt, from The WSJ, Sept. 11, 2024..


Related posts:

Hey Baby, Can I Get Your Number? And by That, I Mean Your Credit Score (2024)

When It Comes to Marriage and Money, Opposites Attract (2023)

Who Pays on the First Date? No One Knows Anymore, and It’s Really Awkward (2017)

Can Giving Up Money And Material Things Lead To More Love? (2011)

31% Of Americans Cheat On Their Spouses--About Finances (2011)

Can You Put A Price Tag On Love? (2010)

Do Women Really Value Income over Looks in a Mate? by Marina Adshade (2010) 

Should You Break Up With Your Fiancé If They Have Too Much Debt?  (2010)

Do Opposites Attract? Not Usually, Except Maybe When It Comes To Money (2009)

When Women Earn More Than Men, Is Dating Affected? (2007)