By Jacob R. Brown, Enrico Cantoni, Ryan Enos, Vincent Pons & Emilie Sartre. Here is the abstract:
"Using data on the residential location and migration for every voter in U.S. states recording partisan registration between 2008–2020, we find that residential segregation between Democrats and Republicans has increased year over year at all geographic levels, from neighborhoods to Congressional Districts. Individual demographic information reveals that segregation increases for voters of most demographic backgrounds, but that Democratic and Republican trending places have starkly different demographic profiles, thus contributing to the growing confluence of demographics, partisanship, and geography in the United States. We further decompose the change in segregation into different sources. Increases in segregation have not been driven primarily by migration but rather by generational change, as young voters enter the electorate, causing some places to become more homogeneously Democratic, and by existing voters leaving the Democratic party and causing other places to become more Republican."
Related posts:
People say the president can control gas prices if the president belongs to the other party (2017)
Are some blue jeans really Democratic and others Republican? (2019)
Adam Smith Meets Jonathan Haidt (on political polarization and the animosity of hostile factions) (2023)
Did Fracking in Pennsylvania Turn Democrats Into Republicans and Republicans Into Democrats? (2024)
Are fewer Democrats buying Teslas because of Elon Musk's political views? (2024)
Partisanship deeply colors how Americans think about trade policy, especially tariffs (2024)
See also Americans start caring more about deficits and the national debt when the party they oppose runs them up by John V. Kane of New York University and Ian G. Anson of The University of Maryland. Excerpt:
"In the past two decades, US budget deficits have skyrocketed, and the national debt is now over $22 trillion. But do Americans care about the size of deficits and the national debt? In new research, John V. Kane and Ian G. Anson find that people tend to care more about the deficits and debts when they are increased by presidents from the party that they oppose. Both Republicans and Democrats, they write, become less concerned about governments running deficits when their President is in charge."
No comments:
Post a Comment